Don't Debate, Teach!
The jew wants you to argue over every single topic imaginable; in fact, he will create spectacular dramas even among his own to keep you busy. So long as you are distracted from the only way to truly defeat him, which is to remove him all from finance and media, he doesn't care about “losing” an argument; for in the end, such losses mean absolutely nothing to him, since the jew has no shame, and they aren’t material in nature. Even if you completely embarrass the jew in a debate, he will never admit defeat and will just repeatedly call you an anti-Semite, like a broken record.
Most things the jew offers up for debate are those he can do without. Notice, you don’t see any mainstream debates on jewish Hollywood, the Holocaust,™ or the Federal Reserve at any of so-called prestigious universities. And should the jew run a gambit to he risk something somewhat important to him, he only does so in order to gain more power later; he can always regain his “losses” later down the line by readjusting the narrative and buying more Shabbos goy to do his bidding, since he still controls all the money.
A current example of a such a gambit, is the jew trying to court the far-right with identity politics and racism. Since his left-wing golem have grown too wild for him to tame on his own and have turned on Israel, he now needs the assistance of nationalists to subdue the “anti-Semitism” of the Left. However, the risk is obvious: should the far-right gain too much power, the jew could be overthrown. To prevent this, he goes to his kitchen and creates a Kosher Sandwich for both sides to fight in, where he can control the narrative and reduce that risk. While all the money he invested in DEI and other anti-White narratives can be seen as a “loss,” since it has backfired in a way he didn’t intend, he can always “recover” those losses later down the line, once he regains control of the narrative again.
Understand this, my fellow Gentiles: the jew’s primary use of money isn’t to get his daily bread, but to finance his war against us. He has no problem living in ghettos, wearing rags and eating soup, so long as he can continue to wage his “holy war” against the Gentiles, causing us pain and suffering—this satiates him more than any banquet you could imagine.
The Anti-Zionist Debate
Many of our fellow Gentiles foolishly believe that Israel is the most important thing to the jew; yet the truth is, the existence of Israel is not even a real issue for him, because his true power lies within his decentralized diaspora spread out across the world. For how else could he have gained world domination unless he and his tribe were dispersed across all the nations? If they all lived in Israel, the control they currently have now could not have been obtained.
Although having a militarized state of his own certainly benefits him, the jew will not risk losing everything for it. Thus, in order to preserve his power and protect his decentralized diaspora, he will run the anti-Zionist gambit by leading the debate against Israel himself. And even if he were to lose Israel, and Zionism were defeated, his only loses one base of operations, while every other base he has solidified in our nations over millennium remains intact. This is why the anti-Zionist jew is not a threat to jewish power: he is just another agent of it. Thus, even joining with anti-Zionist jews to debate and argue against Zionism and Israel, is just another distraction that wastes our time and diverts our energy away from jewish supremacy in all its other forms.
The only way out of this kosher sandwich is to reject both anti-Zionism and Zionism, making it a nonissue. Whether Israel exists or not is none of our business; the only business we should have in regards to Israel, is deciding how to punisher her for all her crimes against us and humanity. The irony is, the anti-Zionist jew is standing in the way of that justice, always scapegoating others for jewish crimes and jewish supremacy.
So, whether you are argue for or against Israel, you are right where the jew wants you. The only thing you should be arguing for, is for your nation’s freedom from everything jewish!
The “Debate-Bro” Phenomenon
Another thing I’ve seen grow rapidly in the last few years on the Internet, which is a very clever way to ensnare and distract our intelligentsia, is the promotion of an endless number of podcasts and livestreams devoted to the online “Debate-Bro” culture, where e-celebrities spend hours upon hours a day, debating each other on subject matter that is purely subjective in nature. Such debates don’t help us in our fight against jewish supremacy. That is not the say these debates cannot educate people on some subjects, but for the most part, they are just a clashes between influencers trying to “own” the other side—that other side being just another side of the Kosher Sandwich.
The Debate-Bro scene has gotten so ridiculous, large channels will even host debates such as: Is the Earth flat? Did the moon landings really happen? Are dinosaurs a hoax? Do Aliens live among us? all of which appeal to the “truther” who has overdosed on red pills, to the point he has no idea what is true or false anymore, and is being completely led astray from reality. Oftentimes, these debates are between “autodidacts,” discussing topics they have no right to whatsoever, who somehow became “leading experts” in fields they have no clue about. But hey, it’s the Internet and the grifters need to get paid for hosting these useless debates, while our nations burn.
But to really capture our intelligentsia, we must not delve into conspiracy theories; we have have to stick to the “facts” right? For the really educated and sophisticated types, we see endless debates on the BIG questions: Are gender roles justified? Which is better: Capitalism or Socialism? Is abortion immoral? Is the Patriarchy superior? Which religion is true? Does God exist? and so on. The intellectual, who in many cases is puffed-up full of pride due to his so-called higher education and credentials, can’t resist such debates, and gets sucked into them quiet easily, draining his energy on futile endeavors, when it can be used elsewhere for our purposes.
The fact of the matter is this: the jew couldn’t care less about any of these topics nor what your opinion of them are. He doesn’t care if you think the earth is flat, what economic system you prefer, whether you believe in God or not, or how many genders you think exist; so long as he dominates global finance and you’re paying your mortgage and taxes, you can believe whatever makes you happy. The only thing the jew fears the most, aside from force, is the truth; and the truth is not debatable.
Stick to the Facts!
Despite me gaining a massive amount of influence in the last year, along with a sizable following, you’ve never seen me on any of these debate streams for the exact reasons stated above. I know, as a very humble and uneducated philosopher, we can never truly know the truth when it comes to the big questions in philosophy. Maybe we believe something that happens to be true, but we ourselves don’t know that it is true. So, any of these debates which are based on metaphysics, that can go one way or another, since such truths cannot be known with any certainty, are precisely where the jew wages his deceptive war in.
And you may ask: “But, Lucas, if the jew wages war in the metaphysical realm, poisoning us with his ‘isms,’ isn’t that an argument in favor of debating—to debunk the jew’s lies!” And that’s where you are mistaken, as I used to be, my friend: the jew deploys his “isms” in the metaphysical plane precisely to distract us: he wants you debating everything in the ether, while he plunders the very earth under your feet—truly a devilish art form.
We must not spend our precious time debating things we don’t know nor could possibly know; we must spend what time we have left to teach our fellow Gentiles of what we do know—what the jew is doing to our people and our nations—before it is too late! Moreover, we are not in any position to have such debates, especially while we’re in the middle of a war for our people’s existence. Is it really time to be debating which religion is true, or which version of that religion is true, when the jew intends on eradicating all religions? Is it really important for us Gentiles to debate any topics based on our opinions, when the fact is, we are all under attack?
The Only Good “Debate” is the jew Debate.
As I said before, we need to stick to the facts; but there is one kind of “debate” which we should be engaging in, and that’s “debating” our fellow indoctrinated Gentiles on the existence of jewish supremacy. I put “debate” in quotes because jewish supremacy is an objectively verifiable fact; thus, it is not a topic of debate, but rather, a topic to be taught.
Any good Gentile defending the jew is simply someone who is ignorant of reality. He doesn’t have the wrong opinion about jew and his supremacy, he just doesn’t have the right facts. Thus, engaging in such a “debate” is the perfect opportunity for our intelligentsia to educate the duped followers of their interlocutors; and thus, wake more people up to jewish supremacy.
The Strategy
Now that you know this, the best way to avoid the endless-debate trap, is to not debate your enemies at all; instead, you should simply promote your interests without the need of justifying them to anyone, for your desire to be sovereign and free from supremacy, alone is suffice.
You are, of course, more than welcome to do whatever you wish with your time, but I suggest that it would better serve our cause if you didn’t get sucked it useless debates with your fellow Gentiles. But if you ever do find yourself in such debates, there is always a way to insert the jew and his supremacy into your position. Since all roads lead to jewish supremacy, there are plenty of examples of religious, political, or socials situations that can be linked back to this demon’s actions.
As for me, I rather stick to the facts and just tell people the truth without being bogged down in e-celebrity “Debate-Me-Bro” culture. I also make sure I don’t spend too much time on someone who is resistant to facts I’m giving them; I just plant the seeds of truth and quickly move on, for every second wasted on a stubborn person, is a second I could be spending on an open-minded one instead. Eventually, and I’ve seen this time and time again, reality will water those seeds for me, and the stubborn person who didn’t believe me then, becomes a fierce ally against jewish supremacy later down the road.
So, don’t get sucked into the Debate-Me-Bro culture which is full of kosher conservatives, wacky liberals, and grifting e-celebrities, unless you are going to use it as a vehicle to mention the jew in front of a large audience, otherwise, you are wasting your time. Your main priority should be teaching the public the facts, not debating useful idiots about 99 genders, or which jewish economic system will plunder us less efficiently. But if you do you find yourselves in front of a large audience, the least you can do is make sure, in whatever way you can, to mention the jew.
This is exactly what I’ve been saying: there is no need to justify WN or DR or whatever you want to call it. Take Max Stirner’s advice and “justify” your commitments ON NO BASIS AT ALL. You don’t need any BASIS for your fundamental beliefs (that’s the Jewish trick for endless debates). “I want X” is sufficient. Once they fool you into thinking you need to “justify'“ yourself the hook is in. Instead of discussing how to remove the Jew, you spend your time “debating” whether you should be an “anti-Semite” or “nationalist” or “race realist” or whatever.
“Why do you want the White race to survive?” Fuck you, that’s why
It is no accident that more and more law school graduates come from the Talmudic academies. Lawyers, like Rabbis, have mastered the dubious art of seeming to say a lot but in reality they say nothing of any substance, logic, or coherence. A former fried of mine who was half Jew on his father's side, used to deride that trait of the Jews by characterizing it as, " Jew Triple Talk".