Redefining Racism: Why Some Racism Is Good
Since I am a philosopher, I’m always trying to find ways to destroy our enemy’s propaganda. When recently thinking about the Jew’s use of “racism,” I identified a weakness in their definition and found a way to completely disarm it.
If you think about how people “do racism,” there are three kinds of racism: a racism which is based on preserving and perpetuating one’s race by self-segregation and assortative mating—selecting mates who have similar traits—which I will call phyletic racism; a racism based on context and pattern-recognition, which I will call pragmatic racism; and a racism that is based on the irrational hatred of an entire group of people for their immutable traits, which I will call pathological racism.
The avoidance of a specific group based on noticing a consistent, negative pattern of behavior from them, such as Black crime rates, is not unjustified or immoral; it is pragmatic racism based on the understanding of statistical probability, not on pathological racism based on the immutable trait of skin color. Their proclivity of Blacks to engage in more crime than other groups, in general, is simply an observable fact. Whatever the reasons for this behavior—whether genetic, social-economic, or a combination of both—are irrelevant, as the results are the same. Thus, the avoidance of places which have a high Black majority is not pathological but pragmatic racism, driven by the inherent phyletic racial defense mechanism of self-preservation. But these defensive forms of racism is what the Jew calls “hatred.”
But the Jew doesn’t just stop by trying to claim that pragmatic racism is hateful, he goes as far as saying that phyletic racism is also hateful; this absurdity is an attack on the majority of people who want to preserve their own kind. Of course, by mathematical certainty, there will always be a minority of people who lack a strong racial instinct to preserve their own, and they are the ones who don’t care about racial preservation and will interbreed with individuals like them. I personally do not believe such types are engaging in anything immoral, for they are acting within their nature; we have no right to prevent these people from associating and mating with each other, and they have no right to tell us that we must associate and mate with people who are unlike us. Yet, the arrogant Jew demands the opposite.
In order to destroy our races, the Jew aims his race-mixing and diversity propaganda at our younger generations, precisely because he knows they are the most susceptible to propaganda and experimentation, as they are not fully matured, and their instincts can be temporarily overwhelmed by a constant bombardment of suggestions, leading to a “reprogramming.” This is exacerbated because they are also more prone to peer pressure, and thus, more willing to conform to social norms. If they are told that preserving themselves is hateful, then they will avoid doing so.
This genocidal campaign is mostly targeted at White people, since the Jew’s plan is to reduce their numbers. However, the Jew has to also convince other races to mix with Whites, because if the other races have a strong preference for their own, no races will mix with them.
Of all the races of mankind, Whites are the most susceptible to accept diversity and multiculturalism due to their high altruism. Such altruism can be transformed into a pathological altruism, simply by installing a new “moral code” which declares that racial self-preservation is immoral. This pathological altruism is a phenomenon rarely found in other races; I would say the closest race who has a suicidal altruism would be the Japanese, followed by Koreans, whose honor cultures demand accountability. But East Asians are much more “racist” than Whites, preferring to associate their own.
The Jew has successfully installed their anti-racist moral code into Western culture since the 60s, leading White countries to commit racial suicide, mostly by accepting millions of unassimilable peoples into their homeland. Despite what many pro-Whites think, race-mixing has never and will never be the main driver of White genocide. In fact, despite the 80 years of race-mixing propaganda, White women are the least likely to race-mix compared to Black, Latino, and Asian women. Unfortunately, they are the most likely to support diversity and multiculturalism, which is more problematic than race-mixing, as it affects the entire population’s survival on a mass scale.
The reason anti-racist propaganda is mostly geared toward Whites, is because the Jew wants to destroy his most powerful enemy: Whites have proven to be their biggest threat for the last 2000 years. Historically, East Asians have been an isolated people; for example, in the last 5000 years, only recently has China expanded her operations into Africa, engaging in a kind of mutually beneficial colonialism.
Whites, on the other hand, have always been a colonial race, and they are now paying a heavy price for it. In fact, their history of colonialism has been shaped into the very effective propaganda that has convinced them to engage in this mass self-flagellation while also getting other races to turn their pragmatic racism against Whites into a pathological racism against them.
But lately, there has been a massive rejection of Jewish race-mixing and diversity propaganda: although our youth are the most susceptible to reprogramming, they have always been the most rebellious sector of our society, rejecting established order. And since anti-racism has been the status quo for the last 80 years, they are finally rejecting it on a mass scale, especially since its negative effects have become so obvious to everyone. To be clear: they're not engaging in more pathological racism; on the contrary, they are engaging in more phyletic and pragmatic racism instead.
In conclusion, I argue that both phyletic and pragmatic racism are always justified; in fact, they are a moral imperative. Anyone who claims otherwise is literally promoting genocide and should be seen as enemies of mankind.
These forms of racism are nothing but natural defense mechanisms, instincts that manifest as preferences that lead to the security and perpetuation of a group. So long as that group is not engaging in any pathological racism, then there is no argument against their phyletic and pragmatic racism.
tuating one’s race by self-segregation and assortative mating—selecting mates who have similar traits—which I will call phyletic racism; a racism based on context and pattern-recognition, which I will call pragmatic racism; and a racism that is based on the irrational hatred of an entire group of people for their immutable traits, which I will call pathological racism.
The avoidance of a specific group based on noticing a consistent, negative pattern of behavior from them, such as Black crime rates, is not unjustified or immoral; it is pragmatic racism based on the understanding of statistical probability, not on pathological racism based on the immutable trait of skin color. Their proclivity of Blacks to engage in more crime than other groups, in general, is simply an observable fact. Whatever the reasons for this behavior—whether genetic, social-economic, or a combination of both—are irrelevant, as the results are the same. Thus, the avoidance of places which have a high Black majority is not pathological but pragmatic racism, driven by the inherent phyletic racial defense mechanism of self-preservation. But these defensive forms of racism is what the Jew calls “hatred.”
But the Jew doesn’t just stop by trying to claim that pragmatic racism is hateful, he goes as far as saying that phyletic racism is also hateful; this absurdity is an attack on the majority of people who want to preserve their own kind. Of course, by mathematical certainty, there will always be a minority of people who lack a strong racial instinct to preserve their own, and they are the ones who don’t care about racial preservation and will interbreed with individuals like them. I personally do not believe such types are engaging in anything immoral, for they are acting within their nature; we have no right to prevent these people from associating and mating with each other, and they have no right to tell us that we must associate and mate with people who are unlike us. Yet, the arrogant Jew demands the opposite.
In order to destroy our races, the Jew aims his race-mixing and diversity propaganda at our younger generations, precisely because he knows they are the most susceptible to propaganda and experimentation, as they are not fully matured, and their instincts can be temporarily overwhelmed by a constant bombardment of suggestions, leading to a “reprogramming.” This is exacerbated because they are also more prone to peer pressure, and thus, more willing to conform to social norms. If they are told that preserving themselves is hateful, then they will avoid doing so.
This genocidal campaign is mostly targeted at White people, since the Jew’s plan is to reduce their numbers. However, the Jew has to also convince other races to mix with Whites, because if the other races have a strong preference for their own, no races will mix with them.
Of all the races of mankind, Whites are the most susceptible to accept diversity and multiculturalism due to their high altruism. Such altruism can be transformed into a pathological altruism, simply by installing a new “moral code” which declares that racial self-preservation is immoral. This pathological altruism is a phenomenon rarely found in other races; I would say the closest race who has a suicidal altruism would be the Japanese, followed by Koreans, whose honor cultures demand accountability. But East Asians are much more “racist” than Whites, preferring to associate their own.
The Jew has successfully installed their anti-racist moral code into Western culture since the 60s, leading White countries to commit racial suicide, mostly by accepting millions of unassimilable peoples into their homeland. Despite what many pro-Whites think, race-mixing has never and will never be the main driver of White genocide. In fact, despite the 80 years of race-mixing propaganda, White women are the least likely to race-mix compared to Black, Latino, and Asian women. Unfortunately, they are the most likely to support diversity and multiculturalism, which is more problematic than race-mixing, as it affects the entire population’s survival on a mass scale.
The reason anti-racist propaganda is mostly geared toward Whites, is because the Jew wants to destroy his most powerful enemy: Whites have proven to be their biggest threat for the last 2000 years. Historically, East Asians have been an isolated people; for example, in the last 5000 years, only recently has China expanded her operations into Africa, engaging in a kind of mutually beneficial colonialism.
Whites, on the other hand, have always been a colonial race, and they are now paying a heavy price for it. In fact, their history of colonialism has been shaped into the very effective propaganda that has convinced them to engage in this mass self-flagellation while also getting other races to turn their pragmatic racism against Whites into a pathological racism against them.
But lately, there has been a massive rejection of Jewish race-mixing and diversity propaganda: although our youth are the most susceptible to reprogramming, they have always been the most rebellious sector of our society, rejecting established order. And since anti-racism has been the status quo for the last 80 years, they are finally rejecting it on a mass scale, especially since its negative effects have become so obvious to everyone. To be clear: they're not engaging in more pathological racism; on the contrary, they are engaging in more phyletic and pragmatic racism instead.
In conclusion, I argue that both phyletic and pragmatic racism are always justified; in fact, they are a moral imperative. Anyone who claims otherwise is literally promoting genocide and should be seen as enemies of mankind.
These forms of racism are nothing but natural defense mechanisms, instincts that manifest as preferences that lead to the security and perpetuation of a group. So long as that group is not engaging in any pathological racism, then there is no argument against their phyletic and pragmatic racism.
I’m not into a rationality, but as an Identity Christian I have to come at the issue as complete separation in order to preserve the lineage of my people. OK, those people who don’t really care in my own race, let them go elsewhere. Let’s find a place somewhere on the planet, where people can just do whatever the hell they want. And then send them there. If race mixing can elevate the black race, questionable lead vest, send them all to Africa so it can raise the genetic potential of the Negroid race in general. Hopefully all the mulattos don’t end up like the ones on Haiti back at the beginning of the 19th century.
Great article! So many white people are still terrified at the idea of being called racist. The points that you made should be easily understood by any reasonable, intelligent person. I'll be sharing this article and it's ideas with anyone that is still stuck in their cucked way of thinking.